Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Environment //+ (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
comment |
|||
Line 10:
*'''Delete''' Forget notability (which it apparently doesn't have, per my review), why hasn't this been speedied? [[User talk:Lourdes|<span style="color:#0000FF;">'''Lourdes'''</span>]] 05:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' - What speedy category? Software doesn't fit any of the A7 categories, because it isn't a company, person, or web content. It isn't advertising if it doesn't describe the product well enough to try to sell it. Probably hoax, but the speedy criterion is clear hoaxes. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 15:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' May or may not be a hoax. Some secret company may or may not be working on a new programming language. The fact is, there are no reliable sources to reference an article, even a stub. The article can be recreated if/when the project comes to fruition and if/when the product becomes notable. [[User:Neiltonks|Neiltonks]] ([[User talk:Neiltonks|talk]]) 17:28, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
| |||