Content deleted Content added
perl6? |
|||
Line 126:
Is the legend entirely necessary? I am minded to remove the '*' entry and have blank cells where a language has no direct predecessor. Comments or votes, anyone? - [[User:Chris Wood|Chris Wood]] 14:10, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
:Another point: If the legend is to have any meaning, shouldn't we also abide by its parenthesis notation for designating non-universal proglangs? [[VisiCalc|VISICALC]], for instance, is categorized as a ___domain-specific language, and as such should be marked as non-uni. Or is "universal" to be understood as any language capable of simulating a [[Turing machine]]? (in which case a proglang is to be ''very'' restricted not to be considered "universal", even though it may be thoroughly impractical for doing anything else than ___domain-specific tasks). --[[User:Wernher|Wernher]] 04:22, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
I've replaced the asterisks in the table with "none (unique language)" to match what the key was saying - would this still make sense if it just said "none"? "( Entry ) means a non-universal programming language" didn't seem to refer to anything, as none of the entry titles are in parentheses, so I removed the legend entirely. --[[User:McGeddon|McGeddon]] ([[User talk:McGeddon|talk]]) 10:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
==About Chrome==
| |||