Revision as of 22:12, 7 January 2017 edit 129.59.122.20 (talk) →Rules: Removed opinionated segment discussion the success of the project due to irrelevance and especially due to the language it used being inappropriate for usage in an encyclopedia. Academic writing guidelines should be adhered to. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:30, 25 February 2017 edit undo Bender the Bot (talk \| contribs) Bots 1,064,377 edits m →Rules: HTTP→HTTPS for The New York Times. using AWB Next edit →
Line 10: Up to 32 ideas may be selected every month in each of the following grant segments: $5K; $25K; $50K; and $250k. Individuals, non-profits, and socially beneficial businesses are eligible to compete in all categories. In September 2010, the Pepsi Refresh Project was criticized for allowing a coalition of progressive, nonprofit organizations called the 'Progressive Slate' to participate in the project, accusing the company of violating its own terms. <ref>[~~http~~https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/01/business/01pepsi.html "Pepsi Refresh Contestant Claims Rules Were Broken"]</ref>

Pepsi Refresh Project: Difference between revisions