Content deleted Content added
renamed |
→What's with the Prolog interjections?: commenting on appropriateness of comparisons to prolog |
||
Line 106:
The way this article reads it's like someone wrote a puff piece for Mercury and someone else wrote margin notes with arrows pointing to circled text defensively saying "BUT PROLOG CAN DO THIS TOO!". This makes Wikipedia look like its editors belong on the short bus. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/66.249.20.178|66.249.20.178]] ([[User talk:66.249.20.178|talk]]) 07:39, 31 December 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Um, no, it really doesn't seem that way at all. I think you are projecting a little. How is that short bus treating you? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.141.142.230|86.141.142.230]] ([[User talk:86.141.142.230|talk]]) 20:30, 24 April 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:: Looks OK to me. The language is a descendant of Prolog, it's unsuprising that it mentions it, and I'm not seeing 'but prolog can do this too'. Maybe this comment's out of date. [[User:Anniepoo|Anniepoo]] ([[User talk:Anniepoo|talk]]) 00:00, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
| |||