Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from User talk:ProgrammingGeek) (bot |
No edit summary |
||
Line 114:
|}
: Looks delicious, thanks! '''<span style="color:Green">Programming</span><span style="color:Orange">Geek</span>''' ([[User:ProgrammingGeek|Page!]] • [[User talk:ProgrammingGeek|Talk!]] • [[Special:Contributions/ProgrammingGeek|Contribs!]]) 16:23, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
== 10:47:12, 19 December 2016 review of submission by Carlomagno4 ==
{{Lafc|username=Carlomagno4|ts=10:47:12, 19 December 2016|declined=Draft:JadoPado}}
Hi ProgrammingGeek
Thanks for reviewing my article. Can you please guide me and let me know more details on why my article about JadoPado has been rejected? will be great help so i can fix it and submit it again.
Thanks a lot in advance.
Regards
== 18:36:22, 19 December 2016 review of submission by Oldyorke ==
{{Lafc|username=Oldyorke|ts=18:36:22, 19 December 2016|declined=Draft:The_Unknown_Woman_(Rahway_1887)}}
Hi there - check out these new sources - this story was covered heavily in both the contemporary press and recent published literature - let me know thoughts!
== 13:23:53, 5 January 2017 review of submission by SunSetter ==
{{Lafc|username=SunSetter|ts=13:23:53, 5 January 2017|declined=Draft:Carbon_Tracker_Initiative}}
Thank you for reviewing my submission. I must say that I am surprised at the rejection, given that all the main sources cited to establish the notability of the organisation are external & independent - notably Reuters, the Financial Times and the Guardian. They are not references to Carbon Tracker's own website (which are mostly links to the pieces of research cited)
As such, could you kindly explain which parts read like an advertisement? Please note that the Bill McKibben reference on number of shares & likes is taken from another Wikipedia page. Upon rereading, perhaps some of the historical bits of the organisation could be trimmed down, but other than that, I genuinely am puzzled.
Many thanks and happy new year!
== Re: Bio-Cancer draft ==
|