Wikipedia:But I'm an administrator!: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Paulmcdonald (talk | contribs) m wordsmith |
Paulmcdonald (talk | contribs) added more explanation |
||
Line 9:
''I have over 35,000 edits recorded on Wikipedia. According to [[Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of edits]], I am ranked 1,927 in terms of most edits among all registered Wikipedians. I'm not "number 1" but I've done a lot. And I'm wrong a lot.--[[User:Paulmcdonald|Paul McDonald]] ([[User talk:Paulmcdonald|talk]]) 02:04, 19 April 2017 (UTC)''
</blockquote>
Each argument should stand on its own accord in Wikipedia discussions. That means the newest editor may have the best idea or the most relevant point of view. Don't let anything like "seniority" sway your opinion. If the "experienced" editor has information why they hold a certain position in a discussion, they should be able to convey that experience in a way that other editors can make their own judgement based on that experience. In other words, provide details for the experience, don't just respond with "Befcause I'm an Admin, so there."
{{Wikipedia essays}}
| |||