Host-based intrusion detection system comparison: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 93:
|
|-
| [http://www.unhide-forensics.info unhide]<ref name="unhide">{{cite web |url=https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=unhide |title=unhide |publisher=debian |accessdate=2017-04-17 }}unhide is notable because it's part of Debian and Fedora</ref>
| 2012
| {{yes}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=unhide |title=UnHide |publisher=Ubuntu |accessdate=2017-04-19 }} UnHide in the Ubuntu Repositories</ref>
Line 115:
|
|-
| [https://sourceforge.net/p/logwatch/wiki/Home/ Logwatch]<ref name="Logwatch">{{cite web |url=https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=logwatch |title=Logwatch |publisher=debian |accessdate=2017-04-17 }} Logwatch is notable because it's part of Debian and Fedora</ref>
| 2017
| {{yes}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=logwatch |title=LogWatch |publisher=Ubuntu |accessdate=2017-04-19 }} LogWatch in the Ubuntu Repositories</ref>
Line 134:
| {{yes}}
|
| {{no}}
|
|
|-
| Epylog<ref name="Logcheck">{{cite web |url=https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=epylog |title=Epylog |publisher=debian |accessdate=2017-04-17 }} Epylog is notable because it's part of Debian and Fedora</ref>
| 2014
| {{yes}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=epylog |title=Epylog |publisher=Ubuntu |accessdate=2017-04-19 }} Epylog in the Ubuntu Repositories</ref>
Line 145:
| {{yes}}
|
| {{no}}
|
|-
| [https://sourceforge.net/projects/swatch/?source=directory SWATCH]<ref name="Logcheck">{{cite web |url=https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=swatch |title=SWATCH |publisher=debian |accessdate=2017-04-17 }} SWATCH is notable because it's part of Debian and Fedora</ref>
| 2015
| {{yes}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=swatch |title=SWATCH |publisher=Ubuntu |accessdate=2017-04-19 }} SWATCH in the Ubuntu Repositories</ref>