Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Psychobabble (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 4:
==Psychobabble doesn't seem to understand the topic, and his comments are not reflective of the article itself, which is fairly high-quality and explains the topic in great detail. The tone needs work, however, and I have included a note to that effect. If Psychobabble wants to understand how investigators deal with the problem of parabolic trajectories, he should look up [[ballistics]], as it deals with the same field and the same issues. Don't insult what is an otherwise a good article by trying to raise doubts where there are none.
:I think the tone issue you identified was what I was getting at, 'tone' was my only criticism of the article. I wasn't criticising the content of the article in the other part of my statement, I was seeking an understanding because that was an issue raised in a crim law documentary I saw. You're right, I don't understand the topic which is why I asked the question and it was a question I saw raised elsewhere in the context of an investigation where trajectories were measured using straight line string. Feel free to enlighten me as to how this issue is dealt with in real life, I don't know which is why I'm asking :) [[User:Psychobabble|Psychobabble]] 04:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
MVIS and HVIS?
| |||