Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Handkerchief code/Archive 1) (bot |
→Rewrite!: done |
||
Line 85:
:The last two paragraphs of the lede do seem to indicate uncited/original research, but the Origin and Examples sections are better and have at least of a couple of reliable sources. I'll take a look later, when I'm not supposed to be working. [[User:HalJor|HalJor]] ([[User talk:HalJor|talk]]) 17:10, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
:I took a stab at it. I removed a fair amount of uncited/original research and rephrased a few sentences. What remains is pretty general and (despite any additional citations) is reasonably true based on the citations that remain. I can't find my copy of the reference for the "Origin" section, or I'd confirm that the entire section comes from that reference. The "Examples" section is based on the citation mentioned there -- I rewrote that section a while back, more or less in its current form, so it should stand (the final sentence speaks to the current state of the code, where there is no consensus among the additional colors and the regionality of any deviations). The only part that could use additional work is second paragraph of the lede. Some of that is probably in the other works cited here -- I just don't have them handy. [[User:HalJor|HalJor]] ([[User talk:HalJor|talk]]) 00:56, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
| |||