Revision as of 03:51, 3 May 2017 edit NoahSD (talk \| contribs) 40 edits →Why asymmetric? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:53, 3 May 2017 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,564,868 edits m Signing comment by NoahSD - "→Why asymmetric?: " Next edit →
Line 31: I don't see any reason why lattice-based crypto needs to be asymmetric. I'm not an expert on lattice-based crypto but I have least seen one symmetric cryptosystem and one commitment scheme based on lattices. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2001:BB8:2002:3400:5869:6820:F55D:FD67\|2001:BB8:2002:3400:5869:6820:F55D:FD67]] ([[User talk:2001:BB8:2002:3400:5869:6820:F55D:FD67\|talk]]) 08:29, 23 August 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> Fixed.03:51, 3 May 2017 (UTC) <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:NoahSD\|NoahSD]] ([[User talk:NoahSD#top\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/NoahSD\|contribs]]) </small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> ~~Fixed.03:51, 3 May 2017 (UTC)~~

Talk:Lattice-based cryptography: Difference between revisions