Content deleted Content added
→GA Review: article stable as indicated by talk page and history |
→GA Review: image and intro comments |
||
Line 7:
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->
Be advised rather than bringing up any minor issues I will just fix them myself. If you'
#Is it '''reasonably well written'''?
Line 28:
#Is it '''stable'''? {{GAList/check|y}}
#: No [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit wars]], etc: {{GAList/check|y}}
#Does it '''contain [[Wikipedia:Images|images]]''' to illustrate the topic? {{GAList/check|?}}
#:A. Images are [[Wikipedia:Copyright tags|tagged]] with their [[Wikipedia:Copyright FAQ|copyright status]], and [[Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline|valid fair use rationales]] are provided for [[Wikipedia:Non-free content|non-free content]]: {{GAList/check|y}}
#:B. Images are provided if possible and are [[WP:IMAGE RELEVANCE|relevant]] to the topic, and have [[WP:CAP|suitable captions]]: {{GAList/check|?}}
#::Regarding the model image - what is this images source? Is it based on information specifically found in source No. 2 (being the only source in the 'Socio-ecological model' sub-section)? I'm not an expert on image licensing, but if it isn't based on a specific source, I think this image would constitute as original research. Also you could probably make a better version of it in a program like [[Microsoft Paint]]. The text doesn't appear to be centered all the way down and there are different spaced gaps between the text and the circles. This isn't a fail point in itself, but I definitely think you can make a better image.
#'''Overall''':
#:Pass or Fail:
| |||