Content deleted Content added
Lead comments |
→GA Review: History comments |
||
Line 10:
#Is it '''reasonably well written'''?
#::'''Lead'''
#:: "Community-based program design is a social program design" - two uses of 'program design' within seven words reads poorly.
#::"This program design approach depends on the participatory approach" - same issue with two uses of the word 'approach' within six words.
Line 15 ⟶ 16:
#::"The models that can be used for it are ..." I can honestly say this is the longest single sentence I've ever seen on Wikipedia. You need to break it up.
#::"the change around us" - is 'us' the right word here? Would it be better as the change around 'the community', or just 'the change'?
#::'''History'''
#::"by quoting Harper (1990) regarding" - this isn't a university essay. We don't quote sources on Wikipedia like this. I suggest rewording it to something like 'by quoting a 1990 [whatever the medium was, i.e journal] by [author's full name]
#::Try and avoid one-sentence paragraphs if you can. Can you expand the final paragraph somehow?
#Is it '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''?
#:A. Has an [[Wikipedia:LAYOUT#Standard_appendices_and_footers|appropriate reference section]]:
| |||