Content deleted Content added
→GA Review: History comments |
More comments |
||
Line 19:
#::"by quoting Harper (1990) regarding" - this isn't a university essay. We don't quote sources on Wikipedia like this. I suggest rewording it to something like 'by quoting a 1990 [whatever the medium was, i.e journal] by [author's full name]
#::Try and avoid one-sentence paragraphs if you can. Can you expand the final paragraph somehow?
#::'''Program design tools'''
#::' "if-then" (causal)' - instead of explaining causal in brackets, wikilink 'if-then' to something appropriate, like [[Conditional (computer programming)]] or [[Causality]]
#:: "are to: 1) recognize" - don't number things like this in standard prose.
#Is it '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''?
#:A. Has an [[Wikipedia:LAYOUT#Standard_appendices_and_footers|appropriate reference section]]:
Line 39 ⟶ 42:
#:A. Images are [[Wikipedia:Copyright tags|tagged]] with their [[Wikipedia:Copyright FAQ|copyright status]], and [[Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline|valid fair use rationales]] are provided for [[Wikipedia:Non-free content|non-free content]]: {{GAList/check|y}}
#:B. Images are provided if possible and are [[WP:IMAGE RELEVANCE|relevant]] to the topic, and have [[WP:CAP|suitable captions]]: {{GAList/check|?}}
#::I see limited relevance for a group of [apparent] strangers ice-skating with this article. Can you explain the relevance? Furthermore do you think there might be a more appropriate picture on commons somewhere?
#::Regarding the model image - what is this images source? Is it based on information specifically found in source No. 2 (being the only source in the 'Socio-ecological model' sub-section)? I'm not an expert on image licensing, but if it isn't based on a specific source, I think this image would constitute as original research. Also you could probably make a better version of it in a program like [[Microsoft Paint]]. The text doesn't appear to be centered all the way down and there are different spaced gaps between the text and the circles. This isn't a fail point in itself, but I definitely think you can make a better image.
#'''Overall''':
| |||