Content deleted Content added
Assessment: Computing: science-importance=Low, software-importance=Low (assisted) |
→Notability: new section |
||
Line 61:
Even if you can with a lot of tricks let nim code run on Android (after all it is a Linux OS), it is not enough to claim "Nim may be used to make an Android application". That is just false, an hoax. [[User:Macaldo|Macaldo]] ([[User talk:Macaldo|talk]]) 13:55, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
::Did you not see released Android applications programmed in Nim. If Apple says the app can be placed in the apple store what makes you say you can not use it for creating an Android Application? [[User:Itsmeront|Itsmeront]] ([[User talk:Itsmeront|talk]]) 02:04, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
== Notability ==
The current article is ''extremely'' weak on sources to establish [[WP:N|Notability]], but here's at least one good source that can/should be integrated into the article somewhere: http://www.infoworld.com/article/3157745/application-development/nim-language-draws-from-best-of-python-rust-go-and-lisp.html
P.S. See [[WP:Bombard]]. Spamming a ton of poor sources into an article is not a successful way to keep it from being deleted. In fact including too many poor sources can backfire. If a reviewer checks half the refs and find none of them are good enough to support [[WP:N|Notability]], they may conclude the other half are equally useless and vote delete. [[User:Alsee|Alsee]] ([[User talk:Alsee|talk]]) 21:44, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
| |||