Talk:Universal Windows Platform apps: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Nomenclature: more re
Line 293:
:::#And this last one is the evidence that you are running away with yourself: First you assume this article is about all "Windows app" and then criticize its failure to meet this standard that is only in your head.
:::[[User:FleetCommand|'''<span style="color:#FCC200">Fleet</span>'''<span style="color:#FC00C2">Command</span>]] <small>([[User talk:FleetCommand|<span style="color:#00C2FC">Speak your mind!</span>]])</small> 22:03, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 
 
 
::::#I believe the article in it's current state is already failing [[WP:V]] by stating Windows 8.X is part of UWP. By failing to even have an article in general about "Windows apps", we violate [[WP:NPOV]] by promoting UWP as the only app solution on Windows. These statements I made are easily verifiable by [https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/porting/ this site] which is obviously [[WP:RS]].
::::#Isn't information on how apps are brought to the UWP important? Again we violate [[WP:NPOV]] by only stating that apps can be brought from 8.x to UWP instead of the other methods.
::::#"UWP app is a universal app" Huh? Universal apps are clearly defined here: [https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/br211384.aspx this article] was published in 2015 and [https://blogs.windows.com/buildingapps/2014/07/24/introduction-to-universal-windows-apps-in-windows-8-1-and-windows-phone-8-1/#v5KEUBHEqJTk33zI.97 this one in 2014] and neither are UWP related. Not only is a universal app not inherently UWP, but even though a UWP may work "universally" across devices, it isn't the same as being a "universal app".
::::#There aren't any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that states UWP is simply a new name for metro-style app (because it isn't!!). You can still run these so-called metro-style apps (aka Windows Runtime 8.X, universal or not) apps in Windows 10 w/o porting to UWP
::::#But it was a name and thus if we take a [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] then we should include it no matter how "advertising" Microsoft makes it or how the media tries to avoid that.
::::#I think it would be :).
::::#Notice that [[Windows_apps]] links here.
::::<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #03A9F4, -4px -4px 15px #4CAF50;"><font color="black">WikIan [[User:WikIan|-]]([[User talk:WikIan|talk]])</font></span> 00:05, 11 May 2017 (UTC)