Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empirical process (process control model): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 6:
Poorly written. Poorly sourced. Unhelpful title. Rather than rescuing this article, it would be easier to create a new article at [[empirical process control]]. [[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 15:05, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 
*'''Delete''', nom is right, this is poorly and very partially written (from a Scrum point of view). Whether there's anything here to add to [[processexisting control]]articles, I rather doubt, but given the very poor sourcing here (most paragraphs are totally unsourced, the rest partial in both senses), we aren't losing anything worth saving. [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 16:05, 18 May 2017 (UTC)