Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2004/Candidate statements: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
added my candidateship |
|||
Line 247:
Lastly, I think the arbitration process should be sped up. I would propose and support measures that would do this, including several of the suggestions made by other candidates. Having to wait three months for a verdict is a disservice to everyone
This is a short introduction; my full platform is available at [[User:Johnleemk/December 2004 Arbcom Election]]. If you have any queries or comments related to my candidacy, please contact me at [[User talk:Johnleemk/December 2004 Arbcom Election|the latterly mentioned subpage's talk page]].
[[User:Johnleemk|Johnleemk]] | [[User talk:Johnleemk|Talk]] 16:42, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC) ==[[User:Librarian Brent|Librarian Brent]]==
I don't think any of you know me, as I this is a very new account. However, I have posted for a medium period of time as an anonymous user, via varied IP adresses, and finally decided to get an account. This site, as I have watched, has degenerated due to the efforts of mean spirits who boast of their "accomplishments" and begin edit-wars on a whim. In addition, the Arbitration Committee itself has become corrupt, ridiculously voting on whims or personal vendettas. As a member of this committee, I will bring fresh knowledge to the site.
In a way, my relative newness to the site is an advantage; it ensures that a vote for me is not a vote for the same tired old puppeteers who have been controlling this site for too long.
--[[User:Librarian Brent|Librarian Brent]] 02:13, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
==[[User:Lir|Lir]]==
| |||