Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ook! programming language (second nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Ook!|Ook! programming language]]: what counts as a false positive? |
ook! vs brainfuck |
||
Line 20:
*****: Not anywhere close to 80% from what I can tell, but anyway, the point is, it's more or less impossible to tell how many Google hits are actually relevant here, especially seeing as the top hits displayed (up to 1000) by Google are the "best match" Google can find. [[User:Equendil|Equendil]] <small>[[User talk:Equendil|''Talk'']]</small> 17:07, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
******* I counted pages about esoteric progamming languages that mentioned Ook! as true positives, even if they were about a different language; the test was an attempt to gauge the size of Ook!'s following. --[[User:ais523|ais523]] 17:12, 27 September 2006 ([[User:ais523|U]][[User talk:ais523|T]][[Special:Contributions/Ais523|C]])
*******:Well, compare a search on "brainfuck programming language" (exact sentence)[http://www.google.com/search?client=opera&rls=en&q=%22brainfuck+programming+language%22&sourceid=opera&num=100&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8], and "ook! programming language" [http://www.google.com/search?client=opera&rls=en&q=%22ook!+programming+language%22&sourceid=opera&num=100&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8]. [[Brainfuck]] is the language from which "ook!" is derived. Quite a contrast. [[User:Equendil|Equendil]] <small>[[User talk:Equendil|''Talk'']]</small> 17:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
| |||