Content deleted Content added
Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Template talk:WPBannerMeta) (bot |
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Template talk:WPBannerMeta) (bot |
||
Line 65:
:::Yes, found another subtemplate which needed the parameter passing through. Should be working now?! — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 22:02, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
::::{{ping|MSGJ}} Looks like it's working now. Thank you! [[User:Kaldari|Kaldari]] ([[User talk:Kaldari|talk]]) 01:27, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
== Template:Substcheck ==
Is [[Template:Substcheck]] still in use? I can't find the logic which applies that template. [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]], [[Special:CentralAuth/Jo-Jo Eumerus|contributions]]) 12:57, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
:Yes, it is in nearly every WikiProject * template. They all include the line <code><nowiki>|substcheck=<includeonly>{{subst:</includeonly><includeonly>substcheck}}</includeonly></nowiki></code>. Which only ever transcludes the Substcheck template when the WikiProject template is substituted, which is the reason for the substcheck. -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 17:55, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
::Wonder if it merits template protection then. [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]], [[Special:CentralAuth/Jo-Jo Eumerus|contributions]]) 18:16, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
:::It has {{diff|User:Fazlul Karim Faisal/sandbox|prev|771910298|this effect}}. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] 🌹 ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 19:29, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
|