Consistent estimator: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Tags: canned edit summary Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Ajkirk (talk | contribs)
m changed 'unbiased sample variance is unbiased' to 'corrected sample variance is unbiased'
Line 73:
Alternatively, an estimator can be biased but consistent. For example if the mean is estimated by <math>{1 \over n} \sum x_i + {1 \over n}</math> it is biased, but as <math>n \rightarrow \infty</math>, it approaches the correct value, and so it is consistent.
 
Important examples include the [[sample variance]] and [[sample standard deviation]]. Without [[Bessel's correction]] (using the sample size ''n'' instead of the [[Degrees of freedom (statistics)|degrees of freedom]] ''n''&nbsp;−&nbsp;1), these are both negatively biased but consistent estimators. With the correction, the unbiasedcorrected sample variance is unbiased, while the corrected sample standard deviation is still biased, but less so, and both are still consistent: the correction factor converges to 1 as sample size grows.
 
== See also ==