Talk:Common English usage misconceptions/Archive 3: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:57, 27 June 2015

Revision as of 05:13, 5 June 2017

Line 95:

===Retitle?===

My two cents are that while this article's concept isn't unsalvageable as far as neutrality goes, it shouldn't be titled simply "Common English usage misconceptions" (which contradicts the page's thesis by implying that correctness in English can be determined by something other than majority opinion), but something like "List of controversial English usage conventions that are upheld by [insert OED or other linguistic authority here]". [[User:Tezero|Tezero]] ([[User talk:Tezero|talk]]) 20:24, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

== Peer Review Archived WHERE? ==

At the head of this page is currently a paragraph reading "Common English usage misconceptions received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article." The links therein do not lead to the archived review, but only to articles on the concepts. I am at a loss to know how I am supposed to find the referenced archive.

When and if I decide where to post this question w/ a chance of being answered sooner (yes, I'm reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Questions ), I'll do that. [[User:GeorgeTSLC|GeorgeTSLC]] ([[User talk:GeorgeTSLC|talk]]) 23:47, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

It is in the Edit section. For more information on peer review archives, see [[WP:PR]] [[User:John Holmes II|John Holmes II]] ([[User talk:John Holmes II|talk]]) 01:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

I found it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/July_2011#List_of_common_English_usage_misconceptions [[User:Mr swordfish|Mr. Swordfish]] ([[User talk:Mr swordfish|talk]]) 20:05, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

:I have now updated the archive link in the header to point to the old peer review (article was renamed). --[[User:Boson|Boson]] ([[User talk:Boson|talk]]) 10:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC)