Content deleted Content added
Tom.Reding (talk | contribs) m →Example: CS1 maintenance: vauthors/veditors or enumerate multiple authors/editors; WP:GenFixes on, using AWB |
No edit summary |
||
Line 13:
==Efficiency of the NCC model==
Commonly 1-4 controls are selected for each case. Since the covariate is not measured for all participants, the nested case control model is both less expensive and less efficient than a full-cohort analysis. However, it has been shown that with 4 controls per case and/or stratified sampling of controls, relatively little efficiency may be lost, depending on the method of estimation used <ref name=Cai>{{cite journal |last=Cai
==Analysis of nested case-control studies==
The analysis of a nested case control model must take into account the way in which controls are sampled from the cohort. Failing to do so, such as by treating the cases and selected controls as the original cohort and performing a logistic regression, which is common, can result in biased estimates whose null distribution is different from what is assumed. Ways to account for the random sampling include [[conditional logistic regression]]
==
A case-cohort study is a design in which cases and controls are drawn from within a prospective study. All cases who developed the outcome of interest during the follow-up are selected and compared with a subgroup of the non-cases. Exposure is defined prior to disease development based on data collected at baseline or on assays conducted in biological samples collected at baseline.
==References==
{{reflist}}
==Further reading==
*{{cite book |first=Ruth H. |last=Keogh |first2=D. R. |last2=Cox |authorlink2=David Cox (statistician) |chapter=Nested case-control studies |title=Case-Control Studies |___location= |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2014 |pages=160–190 |isbn=978-1-107-01956-0 |chapterurl=https://books.google.de/books?id=GdXSAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA160 }}
{{Medical research studies}}
|