Content deleted Content added
→Hello?: It must be me |
Explanation of ideaworks3d/3D history (copyvio and PROD) |
||
Line 478:
:zOMG! Now you have royal prince and princesses addressing their woes to you. ''/me dies laughing'' — [[User talk:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington|<font color="black">Nearly Headless Nick</font>]]<span class="plainlinks"> [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&user=Sir+Nicholas+de+Mimsy-Porpington <font color="black" title="Admin actions"><sup>'''{L}'''</sup></font>]</span> 12:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
::Well coming, as I do, from a long line of royal princes I am not surprised that others of my quality and breeding would seek out my counsel. I see, Sir Nick, that you had something of a stalker yourself; most annoying, dear boy, most annyoing. [[User:Gwernol|Gwernol]] 12:38, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
==Ideaworks3D==
Does that apply to CSD for copyvio? That was why this was speedied in the first place (I supplied that link on the talk page). Then it was re-created. Then Ideaworks3d (lower case) was created and much expanded (still with some copyvio). 3D was changed to a redirect to 3d. 3d was PRODd and deleted today leaving 3D as an orphan redirect. I placed a de-empty on it. An admin removed that. I then reviewed the logs and realized that *now* 3D was a recreate of the article that was a speedy copyvio...I placed a db-repost, but you removed that... So, what now. I can copyvio it or PROD it or AfD it, but all this seems like a lot of effort to get rid of what was, after all, just an orphan redirect... Thanks, [[User:Btball|Brian]] 16:14, 30 September 2006 (UTC)btball
| |||