Help:How to mine a source: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:32, 5 July 2017

Revision as of 23:48, 11 July 2017

Line 5:

It is very common for Wikipedia editors to add a [[WP:CITE|citation]], such as to a newspaper or magazine article, a book chapter, or other hopefully [[WP:RS|reliable]] publication, to [[WP:V|source the verifiability]] of a single fact in an article. Most often the editor has found this source via a search engine, or perhaps even a library visit, seeking a source for a detail in an article, some pesky tidbit without a citation. This common approach, akin to stopping at the grocery store for bread and nothing else, rather than "working" the store for an hour with a long shopping list and an eye for bargains, tends to miss many opportunities to improve both the content and the sourcing of articles.

This tutorial offers a very short, but real-world example of how to "mine" a source, andto really work it like a seam of ore for every last bit of verifiability gold. In addition to noticing facts in your source that are missing from the article, and noticing that your source can also provide a citation for more facts already in the article than the one(s) you were most concerned about, you can also often double-up citations on a fact that already has one source cited. While the average fact in an article [[WP:OVERCITE|does not need seven citations]], having two rarely hurts, can provide a cushion if something is found faulty with the other source and it is deemed unreliable or it's link goes dead, and can provide backup sourcing if a third, questionable, source challenges the first.

==Example article==