User talk:ProgrammingGeek/Archive 5: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from User talk:ProgrammingGeek) (bot
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from User talk:ProgrammingGeek) (bot
Line 37:
 
The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:Identitarian movement#rfc_EE4C250|this request for comment on '''Talk:Identitarian movement''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 69860 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:26, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 
== Draft:Luminar review question ==
 
Hi there,
 
There's a page which was submitted a few months ago - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Luminar
You've reviewed its first version and suggested to make it neutral and add more references. After that, I've corrected these issues and added as many references as I could find and have re-written it with a neutral tone without any promotional and advertorial sentences. Yet, it was declined by your colleague, with a note stating that this page "says nothing about it". It's rather confusing since I believe that if I add more information about the product, it might sound promotional and non-neutral, but without it - it's noninformative according to the last reviewer. Please advice.
 
Thank you! ([[User:Jenyajc|Jenyajc]] ([[User talk:Jenyajc|talk]]) 13:19, 6 July 2017 (UTC))<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jenyajc|Jenyajc]] ([[User talk:Jenyajc#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jenyajc|contribs]]) 11:44, 6 July 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->