Talk:Excess post-exercise oxygen consumption: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m clean up using AWB (11717)
PrimeBOT (talk | contribs)
m Replace magic links with templates per local RfC - BRFA
Line 115:
*Well, energy may equal calories (by definition, of course) and it ''can'' equal fat, but the study in question is about ''fat loss''--and really, subcutaneous fat loss. That's not the same thing: as you say, there are many stores of energy in the body that are non-fat. Frankly, I'm not sure there's any conclusion to be drawn from the study ''that is useful in explaining EPOC''. [[User:Demi|Demi]] <sup>[[User_talk:Demi|T]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Demi|C]]</sup> 18:10, 2005 Mar 31 (UTC)
 
Oh, and in this ({{PMID |14599232}}) review the authors state that EPOC is very poorly defined and may be much less of a factor than previously thought. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]]
 
== Protected and discussion page ==