Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakespeare programming language: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 12:
*'''Keep'''. A quick search on [[Google]] shows 664 hits, of which the first 10 are from the designers of this computer language. Maybe more details on the language and it's use as a teaching aid should be included on the page. Even though odd, it should remain at least to show others what is out there. [[User:Mjcompgeek|Mjcompgeek]] 05:40, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
*'''On What Grounds?''' Any Wikipedia page is deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Deletion_policy|deletion policy]] and I would like to know what "problem" that this page has that requires it's deletion. The policy regarding this can be seen [[Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Problem_articles_where_deletion_may_be_needed|here]]. [[User:153.25.87.34|153.25.87.34]] 05:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
**The original AfD (this is a relisting following a Deletion Review) was based on notability and verifiability. This AfD doesn't have a nomination, it's a relist; saying 'Keep, no arguments given to delete' is fine, but this would mean that you considered the above variants of 'delete' invalid. --[[User:ais523|ais523]] 16:39, 4 October 2006 ([[User:ais523|U]][[User talk:ais523|T]][[Special:Contributions/Ais523|C]])
*'''Keep''' 153.25.87.34 makes a good point; it's unclear what policy this breaches. [[WP:N]] is an essay, and the Slashdotting seems to help with that; [[WP:V]] is policy, but the interpreters that are available and a listing on http://www.99-bottles-of-beer.net (which does its own checking) mean that there are probably enough sources available to write a verifiable article.
| |||