Talk:Comparison of functional programming languages: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:53, 25 June 2017

Revision as of 17:05, 11 August 2017

Line 5:

Is this a reasonable category to have? Clean is specified as "No" because the base library does not use monads, but Scheme as "Yes" because someone implemented a single monad. It seems every language should be a "yes" here because they *can* implement it. [[Special:Contributions/98.3.24.49|98.3.24.49]] ([[User talk:98.3.24.49|talk]]) 23:53, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on [[Comparison of functional programming languages]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=795044870 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:

*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131002091023/http://files.metaprl.org/doc/ocaml-book.pdf to http://files.metaprl.org/doc/ocaml-book.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 17:05, 11 August 2017 (UTC)