Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 176.228.51.95 (talk) to last version by Jytdog |
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Talk:Lateralization of brain function) (bot |
||
Line 420:
*Textbooks are not considered good sources for controversial statements. The sentence in question was introduced on April 1 in a large edit by {{user|XenusG}} ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lateralization_of_brain_function&diff=prev&oldid=713001678 diff]). A lot of material introduced in that edit is poorly written and problematic in meaning. In my opinion the sentence in question should be deleted unless much better sourcing can be found, and even then the wording of the sentence would need to be clarified. There are lots of other things in this article that need to be fixed as well. [[User:Looie496|Looie496]] ([[User talk:Looie496|talk]]) 15:59, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
::Ok, thanks. I might remove the sentence after a while if nobody more qualified takes that step — but I won't be able to more constructively improve the article. — [[User:Gamall Wednesday Ida|Gamall Wednesday Ida]] ([[User talk:Gamall Wednesday Ida|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Gamall_Wednesday_Ida|c]]) 16:12, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
== Interactions and Role ==
Many of the sources in the Interactions and Role section seem to be unrelated to the topic at hand. I've tagged one that was a study on rats (and not about lateralization), which was used as a source for the claim that many studies have shown brain differences between cultures. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/128.61.126.106|128.61.126.106]] ([[User talk:128.61.126.106#top|talk]]) 21:08, 24 February 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
| |||