Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multilingual Multiscript Plant Name Database: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
CAPTAIN RAJU (talk | contribs) Listing at WP:DELSORT under Australia (FWDS) |
re-write, don't delete |
||
Line 6:
Couldn't find significant independent coverage. Article's sources are affiliated. Reads like an advertisement. ''' —''' [[User:Mr. Guye|Mr. Guye]] ([[User talk:Mr. Guye|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Mr. Guye|contribs]])  01:45, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Australia|list of Australia-related deletion discussions]]. <font face="Bradley Hand ITC">[[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|'''CAPTAIN RAJU''']]</font><sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 02:43, 4 September 2017 (UTC)</small>
*'''Oppose''' deletion. It certainly needs re-writing though. There are at least 76 references using this source in other articles, and it is a useful resource for plant names. As the article says, it is linked to, and hence to a degree recommended by, highly reputable online plant databases, such as GRIN, IPNI, etc. I don't have time to re-write it now, but it can be done. [[User:Peter coxhead|Peter coxhead]] ([[User talk:Peter coxhead|talk]]) 08:33, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
| |||