Content deleted Content added
Line 18:
No inidcation is given to the relevance of the typeset, for instance, why couldn't Knuth use the same type-set as everybody else? Some explanation should be given. {{unsigned|86.129.218.204}}
: I'm not sure enough of this to state in the article, but I think it had to do with the technology of the time - thirty years ago. A new edition of the book had to be typeset again. An old technology was called
: I'm not sure enough of these details to put them in the article. Perhaps someone can verify or correct them. [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(talk)]], 00:21, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
|