Content deleted Content added
Bob1960evens (talk | contribs) →References: all refs now checked |
Bob1960evens (talk | contribs) →The formal bit: reviewing concluded |
||
Line 96:
It has been possible to check all of the refs as they are all online. I have made detailed checks of around one third of them, and in all cases, the text as written was adequately supported by the reference. I have assumed that the same attention to detail has been exercised for the remaining refs.
===Images===
*All images are correctly licenced, and most of the captions are good. I suggest that ''An image of a Stadler "KISS" electric train.'' could be improved. We can see it is an image, but the fact that it is operated by the German Westfalenbahn would be more informative.
===Lead===
*The lead should introduce the article and summarise its main points. It does a reasonably good job of this. There are a couple of issues.
*The lead should mention that the railroad is in the US, as wikipedia is an international encyclopedia.
*The acronym FPA is not introduced. It should be "Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA)" in the lead, as it is on first occurrence in the body of the article.
*''Some of the diesel locomotives will be retained for service south of Tamien and, potentially, on the Dumbarton Rail Corridor.'' The Dumbarton Rail Corridor is mentioned without any context, and is not clearly mentioned in the body of the article. The article mentions that electrification is a prerequisite for expansion across the Dumbarton Rail Bridge, and ref 17, which supports this, makes no reference to diesel or electric trains. This needs to be clarified.
===The formal bit===
:'''[[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|GA]] review''' (see [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|here]] for what the criteria are, and [[WP:GACN|here]] for what they are not)
#It is '''reasonably well written'''.
#:a ''(prose)'': {{GAList/check|hold}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[WP:LEAD|lead]], [[WP:LAYOUT|layout]], [[WP:WTW|word choice]], [[WP:WAF|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Embedded list|lists]])'': {{GAList/check|hold}}
#::See comments above
#It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''.
#:a ''(references)'': {{GAList/check|yes}} b ''(citations to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}} c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}}
#::See comments above
#::
#It is '''broad in its coverage'''.
#:a ''(major aspects)'': {{GAList/check|yes}} b ''(focused)'': {{GAList/check|yes}}
#It follows the '''[[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] policy'''.
#:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|yes}}
#::
#It is '''stable'''.
#:''No edit wars, etc.'': {{GAList/check|yes}}
#::
#It is illustrated by '''[[Wikipedia:Images|images]]''', where possible and appropriate.
#:a ''(images are tagged and non-free images have [[Wikipedia:Image_description_page#Use_rationale|fair use rationales]])'': {{GAList/check|yes}} b ''(appropriate use with [[WP:CAP|suitable captions]])'': {{GAList/check|hold}}
#::See comments above
#::
#'''Overall''':
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|hold}}
#:: <!-- Template:GAList -->
*I have now completed the review. You seem to be getting on well with resolving the issues. I will put the article on hold. You normally have 7 days to complete the work, but do let me know if you need a little more time, or if there is anything that is not clear. [[User:Bob1960evens|Bob1960evens]] ([[User talk:Bob1960evens|talk]]) 22:58, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
| |||