Revision as of 02:49, 11 September 2017 edit Haha169 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 13,522 edits →GA Review ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:10, 11 September 2017 edit undo Haha169 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 13,522 edits →Lead Next edit →
Line 104: The acronym FPA is not introduced. It should be "Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA)" in the lead, as it is on first occurrence in the body of the article. ''Some of the diesel locomotives will be retained for service south of Tamien and, potentially, on the Dumbarton Rail Corridor.'' The Dumbarton Rail Corridor is mentioned without any context, and is not clearly mentioned in the body of the article. The article mentions that electrification is a prerequisite for expansion across the Dumbarton Rail Bridge, and ref 17, which supports this, makes no reference to diesel or electric trains. This needs to be clarified. ::'''Done''' --[[User:Haha169\|haha169]] ([[User talk:Haha169\|talk]]) 03:10, 11 September 2017 (UTC) ===The formal bit=== :'''[[Wikipedia:Good article nominations\|GA]] review''' (see [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria\|here]] for what the criteria are, and [[WP:GACN\|here]] for what they are not)

Talk:Caltrain Modernization Program/GA1: Difference between revisions