Software patents and free software: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 07:17, 31 July 2017

Revision as of 01:29, 12 September 2017

Line 105:

|publisher = [[Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc.]]

|work = [[LinuxDevices.com]] — news

|archiveurl=httphttps://web.archive.org/web/20051210194015/http://linuxdevices.com/articles/AT4665245733.html

|archivedate=2005-12-10

}}</ref>

Line 120:

|accessdate=2009-12-07

}}</ref> This pledge has been accepted with some skepticism.<ref>{{cite web

|url=httphttps://web.archive.org/web/20120910183540/http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?doc_cd=155733

|title=Microsoft Declares Interfaces Accessible; Royalties May Apply

|author1=George J. Weiss |author2=Matthew W. Cain |author3=Nikos Drakos |accessdate=2009-12-07

Line 178:

|title=We will not go to Canossa

|accessdate=2007-06-20

|archiveurl = httphttps://web.archive.org/web/20070621141310/http://corp.mandriva.com/webteam/2007/06/19/we-will-not-go-to-canossa/ <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archivedate = 2007-06-21}}</ref> that "''we don’t believe it is necessary for us to get protection from Microsoft''".

On October 2007, [http://www.ipinnovate.com/ IP Innovation LLC], a company specialized in patent-protection, filed a suit for patent infringement against [[Red Hat]] and Novell.<ref name="LLCsuitezdnet">{{cite web