Content deleted Content added
Line 95:
It has been possible to check all of the refs as they are all online. I have made detailed checks of around one third of them, and in all cases, the text as written was adequately supported by the reference. I have assumed that the same attention to detail has been exercised for the remaining refs.
:'''Done''' for all except for the (now) Ref 95 incorrect link. I couldn't find the correct document, {{re|Mliu92}} do you mind taking a look at it and see what's wrong with the ref? --[[User:Haha169|haha169]] ([[User talk:Haha169|talk]]) 00:43, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
===Images===
| |||