Dynamic software updating: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:31, 29 May 2017

Revision as of 07:18, 15 September 2017

Line 63:

There is no one canonical solution to any of these problems. Typically, a DSU system that performs well in one problem area does so at a trade-off to others. For example, empirical testing of dynamic updates indicates that increasing the number of update points results in an increased number of unsafe updates.<ref name="testing">{{cite journal

| title = Evaluating dynamic software update safety using systematic testing

| author-first1 = Chris
| author-last1 = Hayden

| author-first2 = Edward K.
| author-last2 = Smith

| author-first3 = Eric
| author-last3 = Hardisty

| author-first4 = Michael
| author-last4 = Hicks

| author-first5 = Jeffery
| author-last5 = Foster

| year = 2011

| journal = Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on

| issue = 99
| publisher = IEEE

| url = http://www.cs.umd.edu/~hayden/papers/empiricalsafety-draft.pdf

}}{{dead link|date=September 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>

}}</ref>

== Code transformation ==