Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consecutive sampling: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Mark viking (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 8:
*'''Delete''' The article seems to be based on a couple of references in the paper. It does not merit it's own article. Can be redirected to [[design of experiments]] or other relevant article. [[User:Adamgerber80|Adamgerber80]] ([[User talk:Adamgerber80|talk]]) 18:06, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' -- Old wine, new bottle. The term is ''[[Convenience sampling|Convenience sample]]'' as it is defined in the article. [[User:Rhadow|Rhadow]] ([[User talk:Rhadow|talk]]) 00:38, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' or merge to [[Nonprobability sampling]]. I have rewritten the article, eliminating OR and adding RS references. The aricle is now backed by six book sources. A simple [[WP:BEFORE]] style search shows this to be a common technique of nonprobability sampling in epidemiology, and is different than [[convenience sampling]]. There is enough material out there to support a reasonable stub-class article. But merging to [[nonprobability sampling]] would also be a good option and might provide better context. --[[User:Mark viking|Mark viking]] ([[User talk:Mark viking|talk]]) 05:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
| |||