Talk:Specified complexity: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 300:
 
Which is the only option for continual reverts by IP hoppers outside of blocking a range, the only other way to enforce 3RR with IP hoppers. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 11:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
 
== The overwhelming bias of "Wikipedians" and "scholars" ==
 
[[Special:Contributions/99.245.89.128|99.245.89.128]] ([[User talk:99.245.89.128|talk]]) 16:00, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Well, it's become very clear to me that virtually the whole lot of you are massively, overwhelmingly biased in favour of philosophical naturalism - the ''counter-faith'' that militates against alternative schools of thought such as ID. There is no such animal as purely empirical science. All scientific endeavours involve a ''faith factor'': a worldview that predetermines the ''range'' of explanations the investigator is willing to entertain.
 
It isn't raw, empirical facts "on the ground" that militate against ID. It's nonempirical worldview-bias, as is cleary exemplified in this forum.
 
So, I'll give up on trying to reformulate the opening line of the article. I'll also stop donating to ''Wikipedia''. Enjoy stewing in your antiGod bias. Enjoy the eternal consequence that tragically results.