Content deleted Content added
PaleoNeonate (talk | contribs) Undid revision 804862636 by 99.245.89.128 (talk) WP:NOTFORUM |
→Metaphysics: new section |
||
Line 300:
Which is the only option for continual reverts by IP hoppers outside of blocking a range, the only other way to enforce 3RR with IP hoppers. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 11:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
== Metaphysics ==
Science is never strictly empirical. There's always the component of metaphysics. Nature by itself cannot establish that "nature is all there is," or that Nature (note the capitalization) produced the universe.
To theorize a Designer is ''at least'' equally rational to positing that "Nature did it on Its own." There was discussion above re. falsification, but nobody here seems to recognize that "Nature" as the be-all/end-all is itself unfalsifiable insofar as ''how naturalists treat it''. Their governing assumption - their faith position - is that no matter what is observed or experienced by humans, it "must" have a natural explanation.
Which brings me to this forum: ''Wikipedia'' is quite clearly controlled by those who are zealously devoted to a metaphysic, a world-narrative, that counters theism. This despite the fact that theism is ''at least'' as rational as naturalism. So because of the current anti-God controllers, I will no longer attempt to reedit the S.C. page.
| |||