Revision as of 22:44, 20 July 2017 edit Oluwa2Chainz (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 19,718 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:57, 27 October 2017 edit undo Ohbopdr89 (talk \| contribs) 86 edits →A suggestion for the lede: include the fact that Ruby is free Next edit →
Line 29: I am fully aware that what goes into the lede is a touchy subject where outsiders are usually wrong. But I went to Wikipedia with the sole purpose of knowing whether Ruby is freely available, something any devotee of open source learning would want to know. I had to go past the lede to learn that Ruby costs nothing. --- Just something to think about. --[[User:Guy vandegrift\|guyvan52]] ([[User talk:Guy vandegrift\|talk]]) 01:57, 31 January 2015 (UTC) :OK, I just found the info in the box situated in the lede. I am not qualified to address the question of whether you want to include the word "free" in the first three or four sentences. ::Ruby is a programming language. It would be notable to state if a programming language isn't free. == Nonsense claim in the metaprogramming section ==

Talk:Ruby (programming language): Difference between revisions