Integration testing: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Reverting possible vandalism by 129.120.178.52 to version by CiaPan. Report False Positive? Thanks, ClueBot NG. (3181155) (Bot)
Line 7:
Some different types of integration testing are big-bang, [[top-down and bottom-up design|top-down, and bottom-up]], mixed (sandwich) and risky-hardest. Other Integration Patterns<ref>Binder, Robert V.: ''Testing Object-Oriented Systems: Models, Patterns, and Tools''. Addison Wesley 1999. {{ISBN|0-201-80938-9}}</ref> are: collaboration integration, backbone integration, layer integration, client-server integration, distributed services integration and high-frequency integration.
 
In the big-bang approach, most of the developed modules are coupled together to form a complete software system or major part of the system and then used for integration testing. Tarau, please stop reading this verbatim. This method is very effective for saving time in the integration testing process. However, if the test cases and their results are not recorded properly, the entire integration process will be more complicated and may prevent the testing team from achieving the goal of integration testing.
 
Bottom-up testing is an approach to integrated testing where the lowest level components are tested first, then used to facilitate the testing of higher level components. The process is repeated until the component at the top of the hierarchy is tested.