Talk:Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.6.1) (Balon Greyjoy)
Line 47:
{{ping|Tony1}} If an article were to be created for the relevant type of spectroradiometry, then I would be more swayed by your move rationale. While the current title is now apparently consistent with Wikipedia's style, I'm not certain this is actually intended to be descriptive title; it is the name of the instrument. This is especially pronounced upon examining the information page [http://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/about/ here]. It reads "Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer" with capital letters starting each word, and curiously, it also neglects the hyphen. Is this worth discussing? [[User:Dustin V. S.|<span style="color:green; font-family:Times New Roman">''Dustin''</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Dustin V. S.|(<span style="color:green; font-family:Times New Roman">talk</span>)]] 17:12, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
:{{ping|Dustin V. S.}} Do you mean the way some scientists/organisations cap every type of spectroscopy? Methinks it's in the mistaken belief that because they're typically expressed with capped initialism, those letters should be capped in the expanded forms (against the advice of the major style guides, and en.WP's). But here, perhaps your point is that this is a specific instrument developed by NASA (which suffers from serious cap-disease—every nut and bolt seems to be capped in their world). If there were more than one of these MODIS's, there'd be no doubt: generic and downcased. If it's the only one, I wonder whether it embraces a measurement phenomenon (moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometry)? If so, that phenomenon could presumably be the basis of other devices. Sometimes there's a grey area where a commercial product ''becomes'' generic (hoovering the carpet; googling). Generally, the trend is to minimise upcasing (according to CMOS and Oxford), although they're not uber-specific about that. Pleased to hear your opinions. [[User:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">'''Tony'''</font >]] [[User talk:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">(talk) </font >]] 01:07, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 
== External links modified ==
 
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
 
I have just modified 3 external links on [[Moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/809760550|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070715215437/http://edcdaac.usgs.gov/modis/table2.asp to http://edcdaac.usgs.gov/modis/table2.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527230429/http://daac.ornl.gov/MODIS/modis.html to http://www.daac.ornl.gov/MODIS/modis.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060701185202/http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view_set.php?sensorName=MODIS to http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view_set.php?sensorName=MODIS
 
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
 
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
 
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 06:25, 11 November 2017 (UTC)