Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rachel Marsden/Evidence: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Bucketsofg (talk | contribs) |
Arthur Ellis (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 168:
===Liam Donnelly and hazing===
I did believe the incident regarding the SFU swim team's bizarre sexual hazing practices reflected on Liam Donnelly's credibility (since the Marsden-Donnelly case was really, in the end, a 'he said-she said' dispute, and everything incriminating against Marsden was stuffed into the entry by Bucketsofg and his cabal). Later, I believed Donnelly probably was not involved and so I did not try to put it back in the entry. Since, at the time, the Globe and Mail made the connection and tried to get a quote from Donnelly (as he does, in fact, run the team and is not simply a member), I don't see how anyone could see my posting as something done in bad faith, nor was it something I have been insistent on -- unlike Bucketsofg's cabal's many, many smears, which, even now, they defend. Among them, of course, is the infamous inclusion of charges against Marsden's father (defended by Ian King, below), the attempts to connect her, through the Washington Times, with the Moonies, and the misrepresentation of the Donnelly-Marsden harassment case and its outcome. [[User:Arthur Ellis|Arthur Ellis]] 20:14, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
===My idea of what it should look like===
| |||