Revision as of 13:44, 9 January 2018 edit Daask (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 33,616 edits Update and improve a citation ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:45, 9 January 2018 edit undo Daask (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 33,616 edits Add Further reading section Next edit →
Line 44: * [http://www.laboratorium.net/archive/2007/12/08/automated_content_access_progress Automated Content Access Progress ] * [http://www.mediainfo.com/eandp/departments/online/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003724998 WAN calls on Google to embrace Acap] - Editor and Publisher == Further reading == * {{cite web \| last=Grimmelmann \| first=James \| title=Automated Content Access Problems \| website=The Laboratorium \| date=30 November 2007 \| url=http://laboratorium.net/archive/2007/11/30/automated_content_access_problems}} * {{cite web \|last=Oliver \|first=Laura \| date=12 March 2008 \|url=https://www.journalism.co.uk/news/google-rejects-adoption-of-acap-standard/s2/a531181/ \|title=Google rejects adoption of ACAP standard \|work=journalism.co.uk}} <!-- quite a bit more in Paul 2008 --> {{Use dmy dates\|date=July 2011}}

Automated Content Access Protocol: Difference between revisions