Revision as of 08:12, 7 February 2018 edit 130.232.105.232 (talk) →"May be more efficient"?: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:13, 7 February 2018 edit undo 130.232.105.232 (talk) →"May be more efficient"? Next edit →
Line 885: If they are more efficient in some specific situations, then it should read "more numerically stable, and more efficient in some specific situations". If it is disputed or unknown whether they are more efficient, it should read "more numerically stable.", plus possibly something about research/disputes regarding their efficiency compared to rotation matrices. If it depends on the platform or programming language, it should read "more numerically stable, and on some platforms/in some programming languages, more efficient". As the sentence is, it is just jarring and almost anything else would be better in my opinion. [[Special:Contributions/130.232.105.232\|130.232.105.232]] ([[User talk:130.232.105.232\|talk]]) 08:13, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Quaternions and spatial rotation: Difference between revisions