Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elm (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:22, 19 February 2018

Revision as of 20:24, 19 February 2018

Line 9:

*'''Keep'''. There's [https://books.google.com/books?id=d5_8MAAACAAJ this] upcoming book, and Czaplicki's dissertation has been cited [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=3885079718013853814&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=en a bit]. The most relevant citations look like [http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A954012&dswid=-29] and [https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3064907] and [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christopher_Anand/publication/317267853_Using_Elm_to_Introduce_Algebraic_Thinking_to_K-8_Students/links/592f2ae1aca272fc55d7c586/Using-Elm-to-Introduce-Algebraic-Thinking-to-K-8-Students.pdf]. Finally, I think [https://books.google.com/books?id=NWcNDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA167] and [https://books.google.com/books?id=lc-foAEACAAJ] decisively establish significant coverage in reliable sources. [[User:Υπογράφω|Υπογράφω]] ([[User talk:Υπογράφω|talk]]) 21:42, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

* '''Keep'''. Here's [https://www.pivotaltracker.com/blog/Elm-pivotal-tracker/ Pivotal Labs talking about their use of Elm]. Here's another [http://blog.noredink.com/post/126978281075/walkthrough-introducing-elm-to-a-js-web-app from NoRedInk]. Elm, while relatively new, is gaining popularity and Wikipedia should keep the article and even expand on it. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bytemanpacifist|Bytemanpacifist]] ([[User talk:Bytemanpacifist#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bytemanpacifist|contribs]]) 20:21, 19 February 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->