Content deleted Content added
NikoSilver (talk | contribs) →Unprotection?: +rsp |
No edit summary |
||
Line 982:
*Gee! Encarta too! ([http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/refpages/search.aspx?q=Turkish+Republic+of+Northern+Cyprus&Submit2=Go search]) Click the first reference to see that it is within the [http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761578820_6/Cyprus.html#p79 Cyprus] article. Those biased [[WP:INDY|independent]], [[WP:V|verifiable]], [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that I've [[WP:CITE|cited]] are cooperating in a conspiratory [[WP:TINC|cabal]] against the creation of a separate article named as [[TRNC]] in Wikipedia; an encyclopedia which aims to protect the global NPOV from the malicious Greek and Cypriot POV-pushing users!! [[User:N!|<span style="color:#fff;background:#88b">•N<span style="background:#99c">i<span style="background:#aad">k<span style="background:#bbe">o<b><span style="background:#ccf">S</span>il</b></span><b>v</b></span><b>e</b></span><b>r</b>•</span>]] 10:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
= Formal Mediation may be a good idea =
Just my two cents. There are POV edits on both sides occuring and as more editors with a pre-disposed opinion join the debate the possibility of reaching an agreement seems to be less and less. Issues from this disagreement are now finding their way onto other Cypriot related articles. I suggest that the issue of the TRNC article being or not being part of the Cyprus article be taken to a formal mediation whose findings will be binding. In addition it seems like a good opportunity to sort out if we call the TRNC the TRNC or 'Occupied Cyprus' or whatever else is the term du jour. Any thoughts people? [[User:Adam777|Adam777]] 17:20, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
| |||