Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Program for Monetary Reform: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 4:
:{{la|A Program for Monetary Reform}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Program for Monetary Reform|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 February 23#{{anchorencode:A Program for Monetary Reform}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/A_Program_for_Monetary_Reform Stats]</span>)
:({{Find sources AFD|A Program for Monetary Reform}})
Appears to be a hoax or urban legend. No secondary RS in article or Google search. Being promoted by fringe monetary policy advocacy groups. [[User:SPECIFICO |<b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']]
:I've just had a look at the [[Chicago Plan]] article and it appears to be just about entirely primary-sourced and OR. I removed a few of the blog-sourced and misrepresented sections of text and there's not much left of any substance. [[User:SPECIFICO |<b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 16:51, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' Why do you believe it's a hoax? Did some research on it and haven't found anyone disputing it, in fact found a journal article possibly mentioning it: [http://www.jstor.org/stable/725805?origin=JSTOR-pdf] [[User:SportingFlyer|SportingFlyer]] ([[User talk:SportingFlyer|talk]]) 23:10, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
::Nobody's disputing it because the article is not real. Academics don't cite or discuss fake articles. The story that this is a key policy document written by one of the top economists of his day, Fisher, but never published and never cited until this mysterious copy showed up -- ostensibly from a single obscure library -- strains credulity. Hundreds of University libraries would have retained copies of a significant document by eminent monetary economist Fisher. And the context in which it was "discovered" is to bolster a fringe activist campaign. Not in the course of research, library cataloguing, or any other plausible routine. Note that there has been discussion of 100% reserve banking from time to time, including by Fisher. But that is not the same as the claim as to the existence or content of this article. [[User:SPECIFICO |<b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 02:33, 24 February 2018 (UTC)