Revision as of 14:31, 20 March 2018 edit Scope creep (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 149,455 edits Had to stop for lunch ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:03, 20 March 2018 edit undo Djm-leighpark (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 24,518 edits m syntax typo fix in my earlier entry .. no content change Next edit →
Line 9: This article violates both original research and notability wikipedia polices. Moreover, it is listed on the main "programming paradigm" template, where it is listed amongst genuine well-known paradigms and so will mislead computer science students who are likely to read it. [[User:Axiarchist\|Axiarchist]] ([[User talk:Axiarchist\|talk]]) 03:45, 16 March 2018 (UTC) :'''very weak overturn''' to merge to [[XL (programming language)]] or [[Christophe de Dinechin]]. No objection to delete. Per [[WP:MULTIAFD]] should we also be considering [[XL (programming language)]] (possible dab?) and [[[[Christophe de Dinechin]] ? [[User:Djm-leighpark\|Djm-leighpark]] ([[User talk:Djm-leighpark\|talk]]) 08:37, 16 March 2018 (UTC) :*I agree that the additional articles also violate original research and notability guidelines. Therefore, I am also nominating the following related pages because XL (programming language) is a single author project with no citations to the computer science or software engineering literature, despite searches, and the author's article "Christophe de Dinechin" is non-notable, with the main claims being the non-notable XL and concept programming articles:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concept programming: Difference between revisions