Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2018/March: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
SkyGazer 512 (talk | contribs) |
→New York mountain and hill stubs: comment Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 21:
*'''Modified proposal''' Could we start with continent-level mountain stubs? [[User:Pegship|Pegship]] ([[User talk:Pegship|talk]]) 22:54, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
*I would fully support that. It was actually created in 2005; however, it kept getting deleted for some reason.--[[User:SkyGazer 512|SkyGazer 512]] <sup><span style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:aqua;;">[[User talk:SkyGazer 512|talk]]</span> / <span style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:yellow;;">[[Special:Contributions/SkyGazer 512|contributions]]</span> / [[Special:PrefixIndex/User:SkyGazer 512/|subpages]]</sup> 15:29, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
::At the time, the standard practice was to subdivide geographic areas by administrative regions (counties, provinces, etc.). The reasoning was that one could place stub articles about mountains into their ___location's -geo- stub category. River stubs make sense as rivers frequently cross administrative boundaries, and though I can see the previous logic in not creating mountain stub types, I don't have a problem with giving it a try. [[User:Pegship|Pegship]] ([[User talk:Pegship|talk]]) 16:24, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
===Khyber Pakhtunkhwa geography stubs sub-cats part deux===
| |||